The tricky part about teaching Afrakan liberation.

 

The tricky part about teaching Afrakan liberation, is that your relentless adversaries trying to destroy your scholarship will not be from other races, but your own. This is why your greatest rival as Ausar is not of a different race, but your own brother Setekh whose mission is to kill you and your productivity (symbolized as your son Heru, the hero).

Sometimes Setekh will be from obvious Eurocentric Blacks, but often it will come from within the camp via agents masked as Afrocentric scholars. They will spend all of their energy trying to debunk whatever teachings an Afrakan scholar presents.

Sometimes, they are not even conscious that they are agents; they just suffer from the Crabs-in-a-barrel syndrome that causes them to obsess with attacking Blacks who are getting out of the barrel.

Often they will argue with you simply because your following is larger and they are trying to steal some of your steam. Sometimes they've even published books and feels that makes them "authorities" but nobody's reading their books. Instead, you remain more followed than them so they envy you and try to debate with you. Same way a small time rapper picks a fight with a big time rapper. When such people try to attack you, don't address them or mention their name (that's how they attach themselves to your more popular name). Keep them in the position of being unworthy of debating with you.

How do you detect such agents? Here are three ways:

1. Ironically, the basis of what they use to "debunk" the Afrocentric scholar is references to Europoid authoritative texts. The material they may be referring to is about Africans, but the author of the material is usually not African. In their mind, truth is the "academy" of professors, archaeologists, etc. All the people who are on the Europoids' payroll. They are such slaves they don't realize that the academy's authority is not fact, but is based on the slave's devotion to it.

2. You will see they spend the majority of their energy arguing against Black scholars than against Eurocentric scholarship. This is the greatest sign of the slave mind. Even in their desire to be "afrocentric," they cannot let go of the slave training to hold back the fellow Black man. They mask it as "scholarship" but it is really just crabbism.

We have so many European academic enemies that we should have no time to focus on disagreements with Black scholars. To obsess over disagreements with Black scholars is the hallmark of a crab in a barrel slave.

3. An image is a thousand words. Thus, while some of them pretend to be Afrocentric in regard to Kemet, you will see most of the images they share (book covers especially) are of lightskin Kemetyu. This is a sign that their subconscious is unable to break from the lightskin/mixed-Asiatic image of Kemet that makes it valuable to them.

Though I do disagree with a lot of their information, I will not waste my energy debating them because I have Eurasian scholarship in my scope mount, not fellow Black scholarship. Thus, I still encourage you to support the scholarship of any Black man/woman who is trying to restore our ancestral legacy.

With people like these crabs-in-a-barrel faux-Afrocentric "scholars," we don't have to worry about any Eurasian holding us back from developing an all-Black Afrocentric academia that can educate our children and conduct our own archaeological research. We will hold it back ourselves if we are not careful.

Don't allow your faux Afrocentric "brother" Setekh to derail you with inane debates attacking other Black scholarship. See him for the crab in the barrel he is and transcend his efforts to engage you; keep instead at the matter at task.